WTC Demolitions

  

“Never before in history has a steel high rise building collapsed simply because of fire. On 9/11, by coincidence, three such buildings collapsed in ten to fifteen seconds, almost freefall speed.”

                                                             — 


The Marvin P. Bush Connection

Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport.

According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center "up to the day the buildings fell down."

 

Heightened WTC Security Alert Had Just Been Lifted

The World Trade Center was destroyed just days after a heightened security alert was lifted at the landmark 110-story towers, security personnel said.  ...on Thursday [September 6], bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed. [NY NewsDay]

 

 

 

Pre-9/11 World Trade Center Power-Down

On the weekend of 9/8, 9/9 there was a 'power down' condition in WTC tower 2, the south tower.  "Of course without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on doors and many, many 'engineers' coming in and out of the tower." [WingTV

 

 

 

Service Elevator "Down"

The service elevator that ran to all the way to the top was malfunctioning for at least a month (up until 9/11).  A convenient "malfunctioning"? The elevator and its shaft would be the perfect route for transport and placing of explosives used to take down the tower.

 

 

 

Larry A. Silverstein

A real estate investor and operator and the head of Silverstein Properties, a real estate development group.  Silverstein was the leaseholder of the World Trade Center towers that were destroyed in the September 11, 2001 attacks.

Silverstein's $3.2 billion bid for the lease to the World Trade Center was accepted on July 24, 2001, seven weeks before the buildings were destroyed. This was the first time in the building's 31-year history the complex had changed ownership.  Silverstein put up only $14 million of his own money [1]. Silverstein was also given the right to rebuild the structures, should they be destroyed. [2] 

In total, Silverstein was awarded nearly $5 billion in insurance money following the destruction of the Twin Towers [3].

 

"Pull It"

In a September 2002 PBS documentary called 'America Rebuilds,' Silverstein states, in reference to World Trade Center Building 7, "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."  [Click on criminal above for PBS video of "pull it" and click on WTC bldg 7 left for video of collapse]]

 

Typical Controlled Demolition

The demolition of the Landmark Tower in Fort Worth, TX - 2006

 

 

 

 

"If you've seen many of the managed demolitions where they implode a building and they cause it to essentially to fall vertically because they cause all of the vertical columns to fail simultaneously, that's exactly what it looked like and that's what happened" - Matthys Levy, co author Why buildings Fall Down.

 

 

 

Office of Emergency Management had prior knowledge of Collapse.

WORLD TRADE CENTER TASK FORCE INTERVIEW of EMT RICHARD ZARRILLO "John came to me and said you need to go find Chief Ganci and relay the following message: that the buildings have been compromised, we need to evacuate, they're going to collapse... With a very confused look he said who told you that? I said I was just with John at OEM. OEM says the buildings are going to collapse; we need to get out."

 

Video: The second tower is coming down.

 

Fireman: Bomb in the building

... start clearing out.

 

 

Abruptly, there was an ear-splitting noise. The south tower shook... [ASNE]

 

Collapse of the twin towers resembled those of controlled implosions...

Van Romero, vice president for research at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology says the collapse of the twin towers resembled those of controlled implosions used in planned demolition.
"My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse," Romero said.
A demolition expert, Romero is a former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center at Tech, which studies explosive materials and the effects of explosions on buildings, aircraft and other structures. 
He said he and Denny Peterson, vice president for administration and finance, were en route to an office building near the Pentagon to discuss defense-funded research programs at Tech. Romero told the
Albequerque Journal that he based his opinion on video aired on national television broadcasts.  The detonations could have been caused by a small amount of explosive put in more than two points in each of the towers, he said. "It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points," Romero said.
 

"I designed it for a 707 hit"
DETROIT, Sept. 11 (UPI) -- Lee Robertson, the project's structural engineer, addressed the problem of terrorism on high-rises at a conference in Frankfurt, Germany, The WEEK PRIOR TO 9/11 (!!!), Chicago engineer Joseph Burns: "I designed it for a (Boeing)707 to hit it." UPI Report

 

 


Jet Fuel Explodes outside of WTC Tower.

The official story was that the fires were so hot that they weakened the steel beams -- they state it was the jet fuel that caused such intense heat.  However video from several angles show that the fuel explodes outside the structure in an enormous fireball [click photo at right for video].

 

 

 

High-Velocity "Demolition Squibs" Are Visible in the Twin Towers' Collapses.

Video: Close-up demolition of World Trade Center 2.

You can clearly hear the demolitions.

 

 

Anatomy of a Controlled Demolition — "Top up" and "Top down" procedure used to destroy the WTC

Video: Controlled Demolition caught in action.

Below we can look at some important frames [click photo at right for video].

 

 

 

 

Just as Demolition begins....

Only a small fire burns where red arrow points.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Next, a dark uniform cloud of billowing smoke is quickly and uniformly ejected out of 80th floor on several sides.

This is most likely related to a powerful, more central blast that is destroying the core support beams.  Actually, the blast smoke starts to exit in above snapshot, but its not as obvious.

 

A few frames later — clouds larger —  now with flames below.

The smoke clouds are becoming more pronounced and still are quite uniform.  To contrived to be anything by chance.  A few floors below there are several blasts with flames erupting around the edges.  The mast is seen dropping some, as the main support beams at the 80th floor are being blown out.  At about this time the flame filled blasts begin on the exterior.

 

The upper portion starts to collapse.

There was collapse of the main structure only AFTER the smoke filled blast.  It seems that the upper portion began to fall in conjuction with the flaming eruptions.  It appears that these blasts were designed to destroy the outer wall beams of the WTC to facilitate the destruction of its upper portion.  Since the mast was first to fall — this would indicate that there was actually a concave motion to the collapse.  This forces the structure to fall in on itself — a technique used in controlled demolitions.

 

The collapse continues as the blasts intensify.

Interestingly, the collapse, is disintegrating upward as it it coming down — NOT downward and crushing as would be expected, if gravity induced.  This contradicts the "pancaking therory".

 

 

 

 

 

Further disintegrating of upper portion.

The complete upper portion of the structure gets pulverized in about a second.  That is not possible with a gravity fall.   Note the expanding flames and intense blasting occurring under the falling upper portion.  The upper portion (above the 80th floor) of the WTC was similar to a conventional demolitions operation — weaken the bottom and bring it down on itself. 

 

 

 

 

A continuation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Upper demolition completed at this point.

As anyone can see, in very short order, only the mast remains.  Tones and tones of cement, masonry, ceramics, glass, office equipment, furnishings, metal, and asbestos have been turned into a pulverized dust and have been exhumed into a mushroom cloud in about 1 second.  The amount of energy required to do that is beyond comprehension -- and CANNOT be achieved by gravity alone.

 

 

 

 

Top down demolition begins.

The lower portion (under the 80th floor) was brought down with a different less utilized demolitions approach — having charges set to race down the building — in a top down operation.

 

 

 

 

 

Charges Race down WTC bypassing huge building sections.

The charges accelerate down the structure.  Interestingly the demolitions race by a huge piece of WTC building still intact  [Click on picture to watch in video].  The pancake theory states (see below) that the preceding floor collapses onto the next and so on... 

If large portions of the WTC are seen hanging in thin air [Another Angle (video)] then how is it possible that the building is seen collapsing underneath it?  Isn't the "pancake" theory built around the "fact" that each floor is dropping down on and destroying the next lower one -- how can floors be skipped... in the "pancake" theory.

 

wtcpancakes.jpgThe Government's WTC "Pancake" Theory

The official version of 9/11 in relation to the collapse of the World Trade Center twin towers maintains that after the collapses of the buildings initiated, the structure above the collapse zone of each building (the "caps") fell on the floor below, easily destroying that floor's supports and connections, before moving down to the next, and so on in a chain reaction until each tower was destroyed down to the very pavement. This model includes the seemingly plausible contention that each failing floor added to the falling mass and with each failed floor the velocity of the collapse increased, and hence the kinetic energy grew ever larger and the buildings were doomed from the start; "if one floor fails (at the top) then they would all have to fail".  Obviously the "pancake theory" is not based on physics.

 

WTC1 exploding.jpg

The governments "pancake theory" in operation [!!!]

 

A tremendous energy was exerted -- similar to an atomic bomb there was environmental changes.

The pulverized WTC complex filled all Manhattan's air with toxins including asbestos.  The government denied that the air was harmful.

 

 


 

Zogby Poll: Half of New Yorkers Believe Government Complicity in 9/11

PART TWO