A Hole for a
Boeing 757?
“At that point we were able to see the last part of the plane,
where it stopped, basically. It was a
big 8 by 10 or bigger, I’m just guessing, hole in the wall. You could see the tire, the landing gear,
were just forward of it. I was more
impressed, I was truly impressed, with how the building stood up, after they
told me the size of the plane. And then
I was in awe that I saw no plane, nothing left from the plane. It was like it disintegrated as it went into
the building.”12
— Sgt. Maybon Pollock
Did a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon?
The entry point was small, especially
just after it happened. Later, after the government’s ‘controlled
demolition’ brought the facade down, the hole looked bigger. Judging from
the windows the entry point for this attack would be about (3) Pentagon
windows. See the graphic below showing a 757 in scale with the
Pentagon. The 757 needs to fit into a
hole the width of three windows, not the “gaping hole” produced over a
half-hour later.
Below we can see no evidence of a large
plane on the outside of the building.
Also the damage is only at the bottom floor. With no gouge in the grass, from the engines, the wings should
have hit above the bottom of the second floor. The wings could not have hit the bottom floor causing this
damage, if they would have, the engines would be buried in the grass. There is not a scratch on the grass to
indicate this.
“So, where are the two entry holes in
the Pentagon wall from the two huge 757 jet engines?”
This simulation
of the impact is not correct.
Note that the roof is collapsed, that happened ½ hr. later (Image: Purdue Univ.).
“From my close up inspection, there is no evidence of a
plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon...”122
— Jamie
McIntyre CNN
(Photo: www.geoffmetcalf.com)
Steve
DeChiaro, an engineer recalled, “…my brain could not resolve the
fact that it was a plane because it only seemed like a small hole in the
building…
No tail. No wings. No nothing…”
243
What happened to the wings?
Note also that no damage to the building
occurred at the points where the wings would have struck the outer wall... at
over 450 mph. The heavy fuel tanks would have increased the momentum
of the wings creating a hammer-like blow to the exterior facade — however there is no
evidence of that. How did the aircraft fuselage squeeze into the small
frontal hole and penetrate intact to the D-ring before exploding? Some
hypothesize that the wings became crushed against the side of the fuselage,
folding back and followed it into the hole. Unfortunately it doesn’t work
like that. No one has ever credibly
explained why there was so little damage to the exterior of the Pentagon.
American Society of Civil Engineers deceived the public.
The Building
Performance Report from the American Society of
Civil Engineers showed that the impact hole at the side of the building was 90
feet in diameter. But they knew that compared to photographs taken
immediately after the impact
(before the roof collapsed from a
subsequent blast) revealed that the hole was indeed only about 15 feet in
diameter, barely wide enough to accommodate the fuselage, to say nothing of a
tail section that extended 41 feet above the ground, wings that extended 125
feet, and two large engines, each of which were about 9 feet in diameter.
The engines have never been adequately
accounted for. Keep in mind that the
engines are by far the densest portion of an aircraft, and almost always are
found somewhat intact at an accident scene.
There are reports of an engine part or two inside, but how did it get
inside if there was never a hole for it to pass through!
To follow the
official version of events, one needs to
believe that the hole was
always 90 feet wide. The ASCE report — was an engineering
embarrassment.
The government-arraigned ASCE Report is at
times, comical
(Image: ASCE).
An observer remarked:
The “aircraft” that hit the Pentagon slammed through an exterior wall of steel reinforced concrete, countless masonry interior walls, and multiple pillars, before it left an exit hole approximately twelve feet across. Can you imagine something in an aluminum aircraft that could remain intact through such obstacles?
Close up of the
impact hole showing the 6’ cable spools
(Photo: www.geoffmetcalf.com)
To pass above the cable spools and
generator puts the impact hole higher than the official story would have
it — somewhere in the second floor level — but that is not
where the damage was observed. The
columns behind and to the right of the cable spools are broken at the bottom
floor. Therefore whatever hit the first
floor had somehow magically passed through these spools. These upright cable spools are proof that a
Boeing 757 did not crash into the Pentagon on 9/11. The physical shape of a B-757 places the base of the wings
approximately five feet above the supposed hole — if the
engines are to pass above the obstacles!
Some interesting questions:
Where did the wings go?
…and the tail?
Where are the two engine assemblies?
Where is the 100 tons of debris?
How did the aircraft that came in horizontally while knocking down
lampposts, hit the first floor, without disturbing the 6’ cable spools?
The evidence at the Pentagon is not consistent with the crash of a
757. But it is consistent with what one
might see with a smaller aircraft or a drone…