Was the Debris Staged?

 

“…we were discussing the LIES that people in [U.S.] government and the Air Force told…”

 — Paul Hellyer — fmr. Minister of Defense and Deputy Prime Minister

 

First reports from Pentagon, show that there was no debris.

The news media initially reported, “From my close up inspection, there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon...”[i] This was also supported by the original Pentagon press conferences that said there was no significant sized debris from an airliner. 

 

But wait…

(Photo: Dennis Ryan)

 

Government workers are seen carrying a concealed container to the Pentagon from an embankment off the highway.  What was brought in under the blue tarp?  Secret rescue gear — or perhaps aircraft parts?   

 

What happens next? …

 

The concealed container was setup near the crash site (behind Bush in the photo below).

 

Is Rumsfeld playing “hide and seek” with debris? 

(Photographer: unknown)

 

Agents picking up or putting down debris?  Or both?

(Photo: Carmen Burgess/ army.mil)

 

Notice the agents above are more preoccupied with the debris than any other issue — like saving lives.  Actually, and they know, it is criminal behavior to alter a crime scene before an investigation. 

 

Rescue workers scratch their heads, and wonder, Where’s the plane?”

When Nurse Eileen Murphy arrived at the scene she recalled:

 

…I expected to see the airplane, so I guess my initial impression was, “Where’s the plane?  How come there’s not a plane?”  I would have thought the building would have stopped it and somehow we would have seen something like part of, or half of the plane, or the lower part, or the back of the plane.  So it was just a real surprise that the plane wasn’t there.²⁴⁶

 

Photos like these show that there was never any debris

(Photo: defenselink.mil).

 

It was only after the evacuation ended at 10:38 a.m. that the debris was first visible.

People, including rescue workers, were told to evacuate all the way back, and out of sight, to the overpass bridge.  People were told that another plane was coming to attack them!  The 10:15 a.m. evacuation was unfounded since the last suspected hijack, Flight 93, had already been shot down at 10:03 a.m. in Pennsylvania.

 

Aircraft parts crawled out from underneath the blue tarps.

 These parts were touted as pieces from a 757, and setup for “photo ops”.

 

The above piece of debris purported to be from a Boeing 757, comes from the wrong side of the plane! (Photo: renovation.pentagon.mil)

 

 (Photo: house.gov/berkley)

 

Notice that there is no impact gouge or turf damage to the Pentalawn from any aircraft part.  They just floated down like feathers, right?

 

This un-charred piece looks like it was cut off with a saw; the middle is completely undamaged (Photo: Michael Lutzky/Washington Post).

 

How far away are they from the Pentagon looking for debris?

Why so far? (Photo: CNN)

 

This part from an engine, somehow separated from the rest of the pieces, while complete and undamaged, it found its way to lean comfortably against some other pentagon junk (Photo: FEMA).

 

Caught in photos…

 

 

 

Later that day — debris appeared…

 

And later, the debris kept growing.  Planted evidence?  You decide

(Last 2 Photos: Mark Faram).

 

 Debris inside the Pentagon was staged as well…

Inside the Pentagon, Firefighter Captain Defina noted— ”…The only way you could tell that an aircraft was inside was that we saw pieces of the nose gear.”²³⁰

(Photo: twf.org)

 

Why is this part from the landing gear so heavy rusted?  Other than the rust it has no other damage what so ever — there is no: scratches, gouges, deformation, or broken pieces.  Notice the polished protrusion on the left, completely unscratched, and free of rust.  It appears that this piece had been sitting in an outdoor scrap yard for some time.  The protrusion was inside a fitting and therefore never was exposed to moisture, thus keeping its natural smooth finish.  This part was not from any plane that hit the Pentagon. 

Tail number found in the vaporizing heat!

It was so convenient that they even found the aircraft’s tail number, which was in good enough condition to identify the aircraft.  As Lt. Kevin Schaeffer from the Navy Command Center recalled of the debris that was inside, “…Some was large enough to identify — including the tail number on the aircraft.  I don’t think there’s any doubt about what it was and who owned it.”[ii]  Amazing that one of the only piece of aircraft that survived, was a piece of the tail (that no one every took a photo of by the way), and despite the vaporizing heat the paint survived to show the American Airlines plane number!  What this really shows is how desperate the government is in its time of faltering credibility.

 

The primer on the debris was lime-green zinc chromate.

The only problem with that…the primer…  Boeing didn’t use lime-green primer (low VOC) for commercial airliners until 2000-2001.  The 757 that reportedly crashed at the Pentagon was built in 1991!  At that time only dark-green primer was used (See Appendix for details).

The photos actually show both colors on different pieces, which is another inconsistency altogether.  Also, the primer on the parts is amazingly unburned and not charred despite having had just being blown to pieces.  Firefighters Carlton Burkhammer noted that, “spotted lime-green pieces from the interior of the plane”.[iii]

 

This part clearly shows the lime color of zinc chromate, which is not

used in that model 757 (Photo: Dennis Ryan/www.mdw.army.mil).

 

The Engine Controversy

An unscathed, unbent, rotor (high pressure stage) was violently

separated from the rest of the engine (Photo: FEMA).

 

On the right, the leg of somebody working on the site gives an approximate size of about 2 – 2½ feet in diameter.

 

Flight 77, a 757 (numbered N644AA), had Rolls-Royce RB211 engines.

Open view of Rolls-Royce RB 211 engine

(Image: Rolls-Royce/airwar.ru).

 

Several rotors, inside the high-pressure stage, have diameters and appearances that roughly fit the rotor in the FEMA photo.  This doesn’t positively identify the engine, but the rotors are similar.  Hhowever a more glaring question is how the thin rotor was separated from the middle of the engine, that presumably vaporized, and remained unscathed.  Impossible!  This further supports that it was planted, like the other debris.  And, as you would expect, they would use a RB 211 rotor for that.

 

Where are all these 70 tons of pieces?  And baggage? 

 

Diagram of a 757.

 

747 pilot — Deleted for Privacy (his blog name) shows his frustration with the official story:

 

Al, I flew the Boeing 747 JUMBO Jet, but not this 757.  I retired before this came into service.  But, from what I see (or don’t see) looking at these pictures; it’s hard to pick out aircraft parts.  The wingtips alone would have sheared off and bounced back into the street, the engines (2) would have penetrated deeper into the wall and framing structure further than any other part making a definite hole.  The belly of the aircraft contains, fuel tanks, baggage, mailbags, and cargo; none of this type debris can be seen.  Assuming 8600 gallons of kerosene fuel @ specific gravity of approx 6.9 lbs/gal (temperature considered) weight of the fuel would be close to 60,000 lbs and would splatter everywhere.  Where are the seats, those with passengers buckled in would be ripped our of the floor, for that matter, where are the passengers?  I have never seen an aircraft accident where the aircraft evaporated upon impact, water, land, or buildings.  If these pictures were taken within 3 days after 9/11, there would have been definite remains of parts.  I don’t see any.  However, digital computer photos can be doctored up to suit any lawyers cause.  From the photos shown, there ain’t no fly in this pudding.

 

One would figure that someone who flies those airplanes would know best.

 

American Airlines 757 crash in 12/20/95 at Cali, Colombia.

 Could parts been taken from it? (Photo: www-cgi.cnn.com)

 BACK TO INDEX